EMR Rating 
= 1 Poor
= 1 - 3
= 5 Good
Devices
(click for review)
Mora RM10
Vega Basis
BEST-MSAS, Vega Expert, Asyra,  Avatar Mora Super
Vega Select
Bicom
SCIO/ QXCI/ Quantum
L.I.F.E.
Nutri Energetic  Systems (NES)
Technology Electro Dermal Screening (EDS) Computerised EDS Bio Resonance Tri Vector Human Body Field
Technology base 1950's 1980's 1970's 1990's 2000's
Monitoring method Acupoint probe Acupoint probe Electrodes Electrodes Field Detector
Treatment method None or electro stimulation Imprinted homeopathics filtered & Inverse electric frequencies Energetic Infoceutical oral drops
Operator bias independence EMR rating = 1 (Accuracy of acupuncture point probing assessment totally dependant on operator skill) EMR rating = 1 (Accuracy of acupuncture point probing assessment totally dependant on operator skill) EMR rating = 1 - 3 (Accuracy of acupuncture point probing assessment totally dependant on operator skill but can be bypassed using preset programs) EMR rating = 3 (Automated screening process but results hard to interpret) EMR rating = 5 (Straightforward, full proof screening process with easily interpreted results)
Speed of assessment EMR rating = 2 (Manual probing of acupuncture points and manually application of test ampoules makes process slow) EMR rating = 3 (Manual probing of acupuncture points slow but computerised test signals faster than EDS) EMR rating = 1 to 5 (Can be used with  preset treatment programs or a complex EDS evaluation procedure) EMR rating = 4 (Assessment takes about 15 minutes but then takes considerably longer to interpret results) EMR rating = 5 (Very quick assessment process with clear and concise results)
Range of assessments EMR rating = 2 - 5 (Dependant on range of ampoule test kits available) EMR rating = 2 -5 (Some devices only have basic test libraries, whilst others have comprehensive (40,000) test libraries) EMR rating = 1 - 4 (Dependant on range of ampoule test kits available) EMR rating = 5 (Claims to perform almost every test ever conceived on the human body) EMR rating = 3 (Performs 145 specific tests that give concise course of action for most health complaints)
Portability EMR rating = 2 - 4 (Some units are ultra portable but others are bulky) EMR rating = 2 - 4 (Some units are portable but others are heavy and a computer is required) EMR rating = 1 (Bulky and heavy units - desk based) EMR rating = 3 (Test unit is small, but harness straps and computer take up space) EMR rating = 4 (The test unit is ultra portable, but does also require a laptop computer)
Compatibility with  other therapies EMR rating =  4 (Of great use to nutritionalists, herbalists, homeopaths, naturopaths) EMR rating = 4 (Of great use to nutritionalists, herbalists, homeopaths, naturopaths) EMR rating = 2 (Mostly a therapy tool in its own write, though could compliment other therapies) EMR rating = 2 (A complete therapy tool in its own write) EMR rating = 3 (Although a therapy tool in its own write, its speed and ease of operation means most therapist could use it to complement their work)
Ease of use EMR rating = 2 (labour intensive and exacting screening procedure using manual test ampoules) EMR rating = 2 (labour intensive and exacting screening procedure helped by computerised test signals) EMR rating = 2 - 3 (preset treatments can be used but relies on exacting EDS technology for full operation) EMR rating = 2 -3 (automated screening but computer software hard to interpret) EMR rating = 5 (fast, simple, automated screening with clear results)
Training EMR rating = 1 - 4 (Some suppliers offer good training others poor) EMR rating = 1 - 4 (Some suppliers offer good training others poor) EMR rating = 1 - 4 (Some trainers offer good training other poor) EMR rating = 1 -3 (Some suppliers offer good training others poor) EMR rating = 5 (Excellent, comprehensive training included in purchase price)
Overall Rating MR rating = 3 (Hard to learn but offers a flexible, inexpensive, portable health assessment method) EMR rating = 3 (Hard to learn but offers a flexible, portable health assessment method. Can be expensive) EMR rating = 2 (Can be used as a simple treatment device but many skills and good training required for best results. Can be expensive) EMR rating = 2 (Claims to perform a huge number of test and almost any treatment but software is confusing) EMR rating = 4 (Fast, straight forward to use, portable with excellent training using the very latest technology)
Price (converted to US Dollars)    $3000 to
   $5000
   $10,000 to
   $20,000
   $12,000 to
   $30,000
   $18,000    $10,000
Buyers Guide EDS CEDS BioResonance    
Contact details Mora
Vega
MSAS
Vega
Asyra
Mora
Vega
Bicom
QXCI
L.I.F.E
NES
         

Copyright emreview.org.uk 2006. All rights reserved. Disclaimer